Home » Uncategorized » Singularity Watch: The Case for Frankenfoods

Singularity Watch: The Case for Frankenfoods

Ray Kurzweill, in his book, The Singularity is Near, talks about “growing meat.” In a pan, that is, not out in the feedlot. Forget the grass vs. grain argument. This beef is fed a nutrient soup.

I admit I was disgusted with the idea of a thick cut of prime rib emerging from a substrate in a dish in some incubator. I prefer things that are real. I don’t even like mock chicken or turkey hotdogs. Meat must be meat. If you want a steak, a real steak, you need to get you a grass-fed hunk of well-marbled, hopefully butchered only moments ago, animal. I could only imagine how wrong a burger from a Petri dish would taste.

There is one good reason why we should consider growing a pile of meat in a pan, though, as opposed to growing a steer in the yard. The animal. I’ve always known the manner in which we raise and slaughter cattle is less than humane and if you do your homework on the subject, there’s a good chance you’ll become a vegetarian.

I’ve done my homework, but I’m not a vegetarian. I order my meat from a friend who grows up the cattle and butchers it locally. It’s organic, grass-fed, and he only handles about 6 or 7 head a year, so there’s no factory involved. It’s the best I can do to satisfy my guilt.

But let’s face it, just because a farm is not a factory farm does not mean its animals are treated well.  Take the case of the Conklin farm. Under cover cameras caught farmer Gary and a number of his employees sadistically abusing his animals. Enjoying the animals’ pain. This is different than the institutional abuse that occurs due to the exigencies of economics, which of course is horrendous and unacceptable. But somehow it seems worse. It involves malice, bad moral character, things that won’t go away with legislation or a stronger FDA. Those things might help with conditions in factory farming. You can make laws that say animals require a certain type of care, room to breathe, freedom from pain, but you can’t make a law that ensures empathy towards them. So I’m left wondering what do you do to ensure people like Conklin are not alone with animals? You can take this particular person’s livelihood away, but what about all the other idiot farmers out there, too dumb to figure out that animal husbandry is not a good career choice?

Peta has made inroads convincing people to wear fake fur in order to stop slaughtering minks etc. There are fewer animals used for fur now than before, so I guess they’ve accomplished something. For the record, rather than wear fake, I don’t wear fur at all (well, except for my ‘coon hat), but the point is, if you want people to not abuse animals, you’ll need to take away their reason for being around animals. In other words, farmers need to find another way to make a living.

Humans don’t seem to be responsible enough to raise and slaughter animals in a humane way. Maybe we should just grow the type of meat that doesn’t have a brain stem. Has no brain or nerves and so can’t feel pain. If that ever becomes possible, I’ll be a proponent of it. I suspect that I won’t like the product anymore than I like Velveeta or plether, but I’ll reserve my judgment on machine-made Chateaubriand. I suppose I’ll have to pinch my nose in order to find it palatable. Hate to say it, but it will be worth it if that means the Conklins of the world are out of business.

Sue Lange

Share

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Singularity Watch: The Case for Frankenfoods

  1. Sorry Sue, that was plain illogical and really lame.
    I take no pleasure in writing that but it must be said.
    Enjoy your factory food, I’m going back out into the garden.

  2. I’m very much with you on treating animals… well, humanely is not the right term, is it? Humans seem to be the only species that routinely exhibits cruelty towards its own members and all other species for the sake of entertainment.

    As for “nutrient soup”, visit my lab sometime. To keep ordinary cells alive, we have to feed them better than most children in the Third World. The expense involved in raising “meat” in this fashion is mind-boggling.

  3. James, what part was illogical? I could point to a number of things, but I’m interested in hearing what you think is illogical. And lame too. Give me details.

    Good on you for having a garden. People who garden for themselves will save the world.

    Athena,
    Not surprised that this would be extremely expensive. Maybe we can count on bulk discounts.

    • Speaking of bulk discounts, there’s another problem (related to the Monsanto intentionally sterile seeds — which is the real issue, not their other genetic modifications). Namely, if food supply switches to this, its control will be concentrated in the hands of those who have the money to manufacture the nutrients. Feeding a goat or a chicken is within everyone’s means. Feeding a synthetic steak, not so much. The required nutrients are actually so high-grade that people might as well drink them straight, instead of feeding them to a dish.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s