Home » science » Weird Science Day Two: Stem Cells, Breast Milk, and Testicles

Weird Science Day Two: Stem Cells, Breast Milk, and Testicles

The stem cell controversy. It’s not going away. Whether or not you believe it should is not important. The main thing is that the benefits of stem cell research are vast. Therapies using stem cells may one day cure everything from acute spinal cord injuries to Alzheimer’s disease to Sickle cell anemia and other horrendous maladies.  In other words, it behooves us to figure out how to get around the controversy.

In case you’ve been living under the proverbial rock, I’ll update you. Stem cells aren’t the problem. Where we get them is. The best source is the human embryo. Preferably about five days after conception.

Harvesting human embryos, even the ones leftover from artificial insemination projects and now scheduled to be destroyed, is akin to murder in some folks’ eyes. I personally don’t believe that, but I can imagine how horrified I would be if I did. I can understand the passion.

At any rate because of the restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research, scientists are frantically searching for other types of stem cells. Doing a quick search on the Internet, you’ll discover that stem cells are being harvested from mice, pigs, human umbilical cords, bone marrow, among other places. There’s much work being done to try and get regular cells to turn into stem cells. Anything to keep the work going without the use of human embryos.

I wonder about these other sources. Mice and pigs? Can they actually be used to discover cures for human ailments? Umbilical cords, okay, no problem there, but bone marrow? Who’s donating?

The real problem with using non-embryonic stem cells is that nothing is as effective as the original stem cells–the ones that are by definition going to turn into every type of body cell.

How many different types of cells a particular candidate can turn into is called “Potency.” There are five levels of potency, starting with the lowest level–unipotent. A unipotent cell can only turn into a cell like itself. Not very potent. The highest level cells are called totipotent. Just under them are the pluripotent cells. These are the rock stars of the stem cell world. They can produce, that is, differentiate into, cells of any type.  They’ll give rise to any kind of tissue needed for reconstruction or replacement. You need a new liver, pancreas, or spinal cord? Get yourself a packet of pluripotent cells and you’ll be all set. Human embryonic stem cells are pluripotent.

The search goes on every day for other pluripotents. Sources that can be used without infringing on someone’s world view. Nothing worse for scientific research than fetters. So no stone is left unturned. Funny thing about turning over stones: you can’t believe what you’ll find. A couple of strange possibilities considered lately are human breast milk and adult human testicles.

Back in 2008, researches in Germany and the UK began looking at stem cells harvested from “routine biopsies of men’s testicles.” Everyone was agog. A great potential source! But then in 2009 it was discovered that yes, human testes can be used to gather stem cells, but they’re not as potent as embryonic stem cells.  Such are the ravages of the scientific method. The world was abuzz with the testicle/stem cell story in 2008, it’s all but gone from the scene in 2011.

Also in 2008, the Australians were hard at it.  Seems they had isolated stem cells from breast milk. Apparently these cells exhibit the same pluripotency as embryonic stem cells. Hurrah!

As is always the case, the jury is still out on this. There is  work to be done to determine just how plentiful these cells are. And as noted in the article, there are skeptics. Are these cells actually embryonic-like or have they been coaxed into exhibiting high potency?

I can see other controversy here. I imagine signs in the hospitals urging women to switch to formula for their babies because “America needs the milk!” or some sick thing like that. And as the article points out, we don’t know yet what those stem cells are doing in the breast milk. Quite possibly they are used for the developing baby, maybe providing for some sort of regenerative tissue the infant needs. Maybe the stem cells are one of the reasons why breast milk is the best thing to be feeding your baby.

We’ll figure it out. And however we figure it out, I’m sure it will be weird.

Sue Lange

Sue Lange’s latest ebook, Tritcheon Hash, is full of lapses of logic and weird science. Get your copy from Amazon or read a couple of free chapters at the publisher’s website.

Share

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Weird Science Day Two: Stem Cells, Breast Milk, and Testicles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s